7. Putting air-to-air missiles on a bomber would take a large investment, and would be less effective than putting them on fighters. First, the sensors and systems would have to be installed on the bomber. Although space might be less of an issue on a larger aircraft, it will still add weight.
With a little help from Boeing’s jet-powered B-52 bomber, naturally. “The KC-97 has to go into a dive to get up enough speed to keep up with the jet-powered B-52,” Lombardi said, describing There is a size comparison to a 737 on the left of this illustration. Quite similar to a 737. b. hehhe, The two views of Fiona the princess the use case would demand to compare the Shuttle to some military lifter. Hold D=4.6m, L=18m compares to the A400M ( thought that is more rectangular ), While the B-52 first emerged in the 1950s and 1960s, the B-52 of today is almost an entirely new aircraft. Indeed, B-52’s airframe remains viable despite years of service due to maintenance work
Boeing 767-300. Current cost $217.9 million USA. Scroll down for image gallery. credit: Aero Icarus. PREVIOUS. Boeing 767-200. NEXT.
00-0001. Fate. Scrapped. The Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed (formerly Airborne Laser) weapons system was a retired megawatt-class chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL) mounted inside a modified military Boeing 747-400F. It was primarily designed as a missile defense system to destroy tactical ballistic missiles (TBMs) while in boost phase.
The B-52 Stratofortress is America’s first-generation arsenal plane, and it can be our next-generation arsenal plane, too. The B-52 has successfully launched a laundry list of aircraft and spacecraft: the X-15 hypersonic test aircraft, all four NASA lifting bodies, the X-43A hypersonic scramjet, assorted target drones, and the Pegasus booster
X6Cn.
